Of all the films that John Hughes wrote, produced, or directed, perhaps none of them are remembered as fondly as Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (though The Breakfast Club certainly has its own following). His chronicling of a day in the life of a free-wheeling teenager determined to take in life before it passes him by speaks to a societal and cultural yearning for freedom while never going overboard with its humorous or dramatic elements. It’s not perfect and parts of it haven’t aged as well as others but there is a purity to this film that time and cynicism have not tarnished.
Rather than spend the day in school, senior Ferris Bueller (Matthew Broderick) hacks his school’s computer system to give his attendance record one more absence to take advantage of and still graduate. He drafts his best friend Cameron (Alan Ruck) to help spring Ferris’s girlfriend Sloane (Mia Sara) from school so the three can spend a day taking in all that downtown Chicago has to offer. Not everyone falls for the much beloved Ferris’s tricks though, as his sister Jeanie (Jennifer Grey) tries to expose her brother’s lies and the school principal (Jeffry Jones) seeks to finally catch his nemesis breaking the rules.
I think this film is the best piece of work by John Hughes because it is one of his most restrained films (despite its indulgence in all kinds of antics). There are certain elements that let you know if you are watching an 80s era John Hughes film. Is it a kind of coming-of-age film? Are most of the young people in it smart, aware, and blessed with plenty of witty dialogue? Is at least one of the young characters working through difficult parental relations issues? If all of these three ingredients are present, along with a catchy soundtrack, then you are probably watching a John Hughes film.
The interesting difference about this film is that Ferris doesn’t go through any formative changes. He’s the same person at the end of the film that he was at the beginning. He ends up with a better relationship with his sister and his friend Cameron but that’s because those two characters are the ones who change over the course of the film. His sister comes to terms with her disdain for Ferris on her own and Cameron decides to stand up for himself after minimal coaching from Ferris. What’s unusual is that these changes happen on the periphery; Cameron’s by a partial meltdown and Jeanie’s via a deep conversation with a punk in a police station. Usually, Hughes’s main character (or the main ensemble cast) goes through some kind of transition that slows the film down and adds a smarmy aw-shucks moment that is somewhat out of place with everything else.
Thanks to his sister’s turnaround though, Ferris manages to avoid taking responsibility for his actions, allowing his wink-and-a-nod lifestyle to continue into whatever future awaits him. Unlike most young adults, we never see Ferris facing the reality that he has to grow up, which makes us question if we can live in a similar spirited way. Does it give us hope that such an existence is possible as an adult? The message of the film is, to quote Ferris, “Life moves pretty fast. If you don’t stop and look around once in a while, you might miss it.” To have that spoken to us by a character makes us wonder if we have been missing it. That’s a powerful takeaway from a teen comedy and one that has been exploited by inferior teen comedies ever since.
I think one of the things that help hold this film together is the decision to break the fourth wall. If Ferris was not allowed to talk to us and fill us in on his take on the things and people around him, he would not come across as a genuine person. Left in the confines of a strict third-person perspective, audiences would view Ferris as an obnoxious slacker who thinks he is enlightened and somehow superior to everyone else. Because Ferris is allowed to interact with us, and does so in such a welcoming and honest manner, audiences bond with him and get emotionally invested in what some would otherwise find to be an unlikeable character.
Matthew Broderick is another key ingredient to this film’s success. Broderick has a very every-man look to him that suits the needs of the character. If Ferris doesn’t look just right, the audience won’t buy in. Broderick looks like the kind of teenager who could float between groups. He’s not too attractive, too weird looking, too nerdy, too pompous, too muscular, or too skinny. But Broderick doesn’t just look the part; he acts the part perfectly. He somehow combines the sarcasm of a teenager, the wisdom of adulthood, and the warmth of a good friend into one person. If you’ve seen even just a few teen comedies, you know that this balance is rare.
I could be wrong in thinking this film is timeless. What does the current generation (aka high school and college students) think of this film? When I was a senior in college, this movie was still popular among freshmen but is that still the case? Sure, kids will probably enjoy the idea of taking a day off to do whatever they want, but will they appreciate more than just the concept of this film?
In this post-Occupy Wall Street era that we live in, can a spoiled, rich, know-it-all white kid from the posh suburbs serve as a protagonist and become a cultural icon? I doubt it and that leads me to believe that Ferris Bueller’s Day Off will lose a healthy percentage of its popularity with each successive generation. Most of that drop-off will be due to the fact that kids don’t pay attention to weekend movies on TV anymore and are growing up with little to no appreciation of what came before the cultural influences they view to be important.
Fortunately, there will always be a minority in each generation willing to look back at what influenced the present. Those lucky few will discover Ferris Bueller’s Day Off and be thankful that they did.
RATING: 4 out of 5
Showing posts with label Jeffrey Jones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jeffrey Jones. Show all posts
Monday, September 29, 2014
Thursday, August 11, 2011
Amadeus** (1984)
In 1823, Antonio Salieri (F. Murray Abraham) unsuccessfully attempts to commit suicide, landing him in a mental asylum. There he confesses to a priest his most magnificent of sins- a decade of torment and subterfuge cast upon the young and brilliant Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (Tom Hulce). In 1781, Salieri’s comfortable position in the heights of Viennese society is shaken by the foppish Mozart. Mesmerized by the young man’s talent but revolted by his impetuous and childlike manner, Salieri feels personally tormented by God.
Threatened by the newcomer’s vision, Salieri uses the power of his position as court composer for Holy Roman Emperor Joseph II to make Mozart’s life a living hell. Whispering in the ears of the Viennese elite, he forces Mozart to restrain his creativity in order to fit the norm expected from the upper class. This drives Mozart to the brink of sanity and health in his feverish attempt to appease the aristocracy while also trying to open them up to the universe of music that swirls within his mind.
Many kudos go out to director Miloš Forman and the producers of this film. They fully understand that, despite Hollywood’s expert craftsmen, there is just no substitute for the real thing when it comes to period pieces. The use of historic buildings where Mozart actually visited and worked adds to the glamour and pomp of an already enchanting atmosphere.
The costume work is another extreme plus. I cannot tell you how many times period films are ruined for me by an overabundance of garish costumes that look far too modern and barely lived-in at all. Amadeus gets it right- while the rulers and aristocrats may have perfect-looking clothes every day of the week, everyone below their station in life is attired in clothes with creases and worn fabric. This is not some ideal fantasy world where everyone looks perfect. This is a recreation of the real world, tatters and all.
If you come away from this film thinking it to be truth, then you have been fooled. Amadeus is based off a Broadway production that takes great liberties with history. While some of Mozart’s letters make mention of very real tension with and obstruction by Salieri, the playwright sensationalizes these issues into a grand cat-and-mouse game of power and talent. It’s dark, twisted and appeals to any conspiratorial and vengeful tendencies the viewer may possess. Most of us know what it’s like to be jealous to the point of desiring to metaphorically crush someone under their heel. At the same time, probably just as many of us have been on the receiving end of such jealousy (or imagined we were).
The interplay between these two emotions is splendid due to the brilliant performances of Abraham and Hulce. Abraham is delicious as an antagonistic. His cold, calculating demeanor contains subtle undertones of sarcasm and dark humor. Hulce is just as adept, though I found some of his most flamboyant moments to be a little over the top. Still, he manages to capture a wide swath of emotions: lust, anguish, determination, exhilaration and fear.
The music, naturally, is a hodge-podge of some of Mozart’s best work. I cannot even fathom how difficult a task it was to sift through Mozart’s compositions to find just the right snippets to fit the mood of one scene or another. The soundtrack supervisor does a splendid job and throws in pieces not often known by casual classical music listeners.
Melodramatic as it may be at times, Amadeus is an engrossing film that hooks you from the beginning. A morally ambiguous roller coaster, it will leave you switching sides throughout. One can clearly understand Salieri’s objections to Mozart’s childish behavior but there are also no doubts as to when lines of decency and humanity are crossed. This is a piece of historical fiction that doesn’t dress its subject up as a saint or vilify it to meet the demands of cynics. Instead, Amadeus effortlessly jazzes up what many consider a stuffy time period with mystery, intrigue and plenty of charm.
RATING: 4.25 out of 5
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

