I can’t speak for everyone out there but I think that most of you will be able to feel better about your family life after seeing this film. Featuring almost every potential parental conundrum of the 1980s, Parenthood is an interesting pill to swallow. Director Ron Howard delivers a kind of flipside to the John Hughes 80s teen coming-of-age flick with a look at the parents of the 80s- those poor souls who grew up in the idyllic 60s and 70s that must now deal with their Hughesian archetypal children and the insanity of the 80s.
What happens to Baby Boomers who grow up hating their parents, determined to never turn out like them? Why, they become just like them of course! This is the dilemma facing Gil Buckman (Steve Martin), a sales executive who is slowly coming to terms with the fact that he is every bit as distant and detached from his son as his own father was from him. But Gil’s not the only member of the Buckman clan with issues. His sister Helen (Dianne West) is single mother of two forced to deal with her daughter’s pregnancy and her son’s emotional issues. His other sister, Susan (Harley Kozak) is married to a control freak (Rick Moranis) who’s trying to force prodigious ability from their young daughter. Then there is Larry (Tom Hulce), the black sheep of the family who only comes back home when he needs help paying back gambling debts and business deals gone wrong.
Talk about your family reunions from hell, right? To be fair, there is at least one rational-minded member of the Buckman family. Susan is perfectly normal; she just married a guy with issues. Unfortunately, she gets very little of the focus in this film. Her contributions do help balance things out as a sort of voice of reason, but the rest of the film whips you around from one face-palming scenario to another. Maybe some families out there are really like this. I know my fair share of eccentric clans but this one hits a few too many crisis points for me to fully swallow it.
Maybe all the drama pumped into this film was over the top when it hit theaters. Maybe my skepticism is a byproduct of growing up in a post-Hughes film world. Whatever the cause, I, and I’m sure others, doubt the likelihood of so many issues plaguing one family. Kudos to the writers for doing their best to maintain a sense of balance amidst all of the characters in this film. Major props also go their way for keeping each character consistent throughout the film but also finding room for (almost) everyone to grow.
There is also some very solid acting in this film. Keanu Reeves plays the same kind of character he portrays in all his films up until The Matrix, but just about everyone else does a good job of coming off as authentic as possible. Savvy viewers will note a young Joaquin Phoenix in the mix, doing a fine job as a troubled child of divorce. The adults and children alike are all on top of their game. The only trouble is that Parenthood is fine when broken down into individual performance but, as a sum of its parts, it feels overloaded.
Steve Martin fans might come away feeling underwhelmed by this film. It ranks among his blandest offerings in the 80s. He still puts on a little pop and sizzle where it counts though, generating the most non-situational humor Parenthood has to offer. This is a film that does its best to cover everything at once while trying to be as inoffensive as possible. None other than Ron Howard could have pulled off that feat.
There have been countless renditions of Bram Stoker’s brilliant novel in film, stage and television. There have been easily just as many movies made about other vampires but there’s no denying that Dracula is the granddaddy of the genre. This makes it a challenge to adapt the story to the big screen. Not only will any new version of Dracula be compared to what has come before, but it will also be scrutinized for its treatment of a literary classic. You would assume that putting such a project into the hands of a respected filmmaker like Francis Ford Coppola would be a good thing. As it turns out, Bram Stoker’s Dracula goes to show you just what happens when you assume…
In the 15th Century, Vlad Dracula (Gary Oldman) leads his Hungarian army against the Turks. During the battle, his wife is told that he has died and she commits suicide. Incensed that the Holy Roman Empire considers her damned for eternity for taking her own life, he renounces God and swears to use the powers of darkness to rise from the dead. Over four hundred years later, an unassuming British law clerk named Jonathan Harker (Keanu Reeves) finds himself assisting what he thinks to be an old, Hungarian Count close a purchase in the heart of London so he can move from his castle in Transylvania.
As it turns out, the Count is actually Dracula, now a vampire and hungry for blood. The Transylvania natives were getting wise to his antics and his food supply was running thin. While making the move to London, Dracula discovers that Harker’s fiancée Mina (Winona Ryder) is the reincarnation of his wife. Strange things begin to happen in London and, when one of Mina’s friends develops a peculiar illness, a doctor calls upon an old friend for help. Dr. Abraham Van Helsing (Anthony Hopkins) recognizes the strange events and illnesses as the signs of a vampire in their midst. Rallying Harker and his friends, Van Helsing devises a plan to hunt down and destroy the monster before it can ruin any more lives.
I’ll admit that two paragraphs does a poor job of laying out the plot of this film but two paragraphs is all I really give to descriptions most of the time. There is more to it and the plot is far more convoluted than I make it seem. In fact, Coppola’s film makes the intricately-weaved story even more complex than Bram Stoker probably ever intended it to be. The introduction of Dracula’s past and the whole element of him being a tortured soul are completely made up for this film. In the book, Mina is not a reincarnation of Dracula’s wife. In fact, there is no back story to Dracula in the novel. He is merely a former ruler who has been transformed into a bloodthirsty monster.
This version of Dracula was ahead of his time. Back in the early 90s it was still okay for bad guys to just be bad guys. As the decade wore on and into the 2000s it became almost mandatory that villains have a reason for what they do. It’s no longer good enough for someone to simply be pure evil. Now they must have some kind of relationship issue, chemical imbalance or childhood trauma that haunts them to this day. This has ruined many a good villain over the last 15 years. Sometimes rationalizing a villain’s behavior makes sense but it’s okay for an audience to not sympathize with the bad guy once in a while.
The reason Dracula turns into a monster of the night may work for some but I found it pretty silly. Your wife kills herself over false information so you renounce God and vow to destroy your fellow human beings? Pardon me for asking, but isn’t that just a tad extreme? Mourning I can understand but embracing black magic counts as going off the deep end in my book. Dracula is far more menacing in the book, where he kills purely out of bloodlust and a desire to lord over people. It’s his nature to kill, not the effect of some sappy star-crossed lovers thing.
Dracula’s background aside, I find myself disagreeing with the majority of critics on this one. It seems that a lot of people liked this film. Sure, it may have more story to it than the Bela Lugosi original but Coppola and company try to cram too much of the Dracula story into the film. Having read the novel, I think that major revisions will be necessary for any film version. Only a mini-series would give all of the characters and plots enough time to develop. There are revisions, but Coppola is still trying to stuff about eight and a half pounds of crap into a five-pound bag. The drama could be heightened by slowing some of the action down, adding more brooding menace than quick scare tactics.
Vampire lore has almost always carried sexual undertones but I found this film to be over-sexualized. There’s nothing wrong with Dracula having an exotic charm to him- in fact, I would have been angry had they not made him appealing to the ladies. However, Dracula’s brides minions baring their breasts for Harker and seducing him into hedonistic trysts. Plus, at one point Dracula turns into something more resembling a werewolf than a bat-like creature and rapes a woman. Maybe I’m old school, but I prefer subtle sexuality in a film.
The acting in this film is also hit or miss. Basically all of the actors who naturally have accents are great but those who lack accents (Reeves & Ryder specifically) sound terrible when trying to affect the required British tones. Add to this the fact that I still have yet to see proof that Keanu Reeves can really act and you’ve got a mess. Gary Oldman is phenomenal as Dracula, stealing scene after scene (and why shouldn’t he?). Hopkins works as Van Helsing, though he didn’t play the role quite as I was expecting. The rest of the cast makes the film feel lopsided, with plenty of under- and over-acting.
Any production of Dracula is bound to make a fair amount of money. The Count’s story has been told dozens of times already and any new take on the classic is bound to draw some attention. I’m sure that the addition of a little more sex helped raise audience appeal in the early 90s as well, but I found myself very disappointed with this adaptation. Maybe a second viewing would change my opinion but I doubt it would help too much. I’m that opposed to viewing Dracula as a tragic lover.
A made-for-TV movie featuring some of the most popular young stars of the day, Babes in Toyland is a modern take on the Victor Herbert operetta. Featuring very few of the original songs, this movie is a very loose adaptation of the original stage production, tweaked in various ways to make it work for the small screen. Unfortunately, the end result is an uninspired mess that misses the mark on many levels.
TV movies are held to a slightly different set of standards but they are still considered movies to me. Movies made for the small screen always have low budgets and the visual effects and props usually suffer. I try to take this sort of thing into account when I watch a made-for-TV movie. Still, in terms of what was possible back in 1986, Babes in Toyland is weak.
Drew Barrymore stars as Lisa Piper, a girl who has very little time for toys because she has to help pitch in for her family. One night, she is riding home with her sister and the boy her sister likes when a blizzard strikes and their car goes off the road. Lisa is transported into the magical world of Toyland, where toys are life size and characters from Mother Goose’s fairy tales populate the village.
The problem is that things are oversimplified in Toyland. I’m not sure if that’s the point or not though, as I have not seen the stage production or any of the prior film adaptations of it. But to me, it seems silly and campy for the 11-year-old lead to come up with all the best ideas, leaving the adults to smile and say “Ooooh!” like a bunch of simpletons. I can see how it might appeal to kids, which is certainly what they were going for, but it still rubs me the wrong way.
The effects are bad, even by TV movie standards, and the costumes are all a little too much. The cast either overacts or under-acts, leaving the finished product feeling like a bipolar mishmash of camp and boredom. The characters in Toyland are exaggerated versions of their counterparts in the real world as well.
What I took away from Babes in Toyland most of all was how similar it is to The Wizard of Oz. As it would turn out, the operetta was written in response to the success of a stage production of The Wizard of Oz. It replicated the same basic premise but changed things enough to avoid any accusations of plagiarism. With this in mind, it’s hard to imagine any version of Babes in Toyland rating too exceptionally high.
While the original story is a bit of a rip-off itself, the 1986 version of Babes in Toyland feels like an uninspired modernization of something that was probably much better. Still, it’s a TV movie. Had this been a major release, I would have torn it to pieces with my rating scale. Since it was a small screen affair, I’ll be nice.
After the significant letdown that was The Matrix Reloaded, the Wachowski brothers returned with their band of misfit rebels less than a year later with this film. Serving as both a companion piece to Reloaded and as the conclusion to the series, The Matrix Revolutions is a slight improvement upon its immediate predecessor but contains many of the same flaws, keeping it well below the achievement of the original.
Picking up right where The Matrix Reloaded left off, Revolutions starts with Neo waking up in a weird sort of limbo program within the Matrix, though he is not plugged in. There he discovers that programs created by the Matrix have developed a sense of self worth and fear of being deactivated. The notion that artificial intelligence could develop ego is interesting (though not expressly unique to this story) but also kind of confusing at the same time.
When the Trainman refuses to grant passage to Neo, he is left stuck in limbo. Morpheus and Trinity enter the Matrix in order to rescue their friend so they can head back to Zion and join in the final battle. They once again must confront the Merovingian, who once again espouses acid-tongued philosophy that, while pertinent to the events of the film and really smart concepts, viewers will probably want to ignore. I finally realized that the Merovingian, for all the good he is for presenting hard-hitting philosophy is his own (and the Wachowski’s) undoing. Where the Oracle speaks in vague terms, the Merovingian speaks in terms of absolutes and finite concepts. The difference is in their personality. The Oracle is frustrating but she’s so nice you can’t help but trust her. The Merovingian is pretty much right, but he’s easily dismissed because he is an egomaniacal jerk.
This highlights an interesting turn of events in the Matrix series. Where the first film makes you think, question everything and look for truth, Revolutions seems to stand that on its head, favoring faith over knowledge instead. It’s a 180 that is hard to reckon with, because most of what people have had faith in during the series (prophecy and ideas) turns out to be a bunch of hooey in the end. Where the first film spent the entire time highlighting Neo’s uniqueness, Reloaded tore him back down with the revelation that there have been multiple Ones and they are in fact a component of the Architect’s original design. The end of Reloaded and parts of Revolutions seem to try and build Neo’s hero mythology back up, but there’s just as much pulling him back down in our minds at the same time. It’s unclear if the filmmakers are intentionally trying to create this ambiguous buffer for themselves or the varying tastes of viewers, which leaves the overall resolution of faith vs. reason frustratingly unclear.
Neo is freed and visits the Oracle one last time. Her appearance has changed because the actress that had played the Oracle in the first two films died suddenly before filming began on the third. The Wachowski’s tried write in some kind of philosophical causality reason behind the change of her appearance in Revolutions, but it just seems like a silly excuse to try and make us think that every flaw in the films can be rationalized. The Oracle’s last message to Neo is that he must go to the Machine City. When Neo leaves the Matrix, our heroes go their separate ways. Morpheus heads back to defend Zion while Neo and Trinity. Unbeknownst to Neo, however, is that Bane- the Smith-infused human- snuck aboard the ship Neo and Trinity are taking to the Machine City.
Here the movie delves into two and a half high tension action sequences. Morpheus franticly attempts to get back to Zion with the help of another ship (and his former lover) by navigating the labyrinthine service tunnels that seem to be everywhere and were never really explained at all during any of the films. Meanwhile, the Machines break through Zion’s security and unleash a spectacular assault on the last homestead of free humanity. Both of these scenes rely on extensive amounts of CGI. Some of it is good, while a fair amount of it is not. The chase through the service tunnels looks better because everything is moving faster and it’s very dark.
The battle at Zion isn’t as impressive as it should be because the thousands of robotic sentinels look good as one massive group soaring down upon their prey, but when viewed individually, they lack that realistic look the filmmakers were going for. They just move too fast and intricately to believe. Plus, it’s very easy to spot a scene composed entirely of CGI. The humans fighting the machines have their moments of ridiculousness as well. Ironically, they use mechanized war suits to fire thousands of rounds of heavy ammunition at the sentinels, but when these war suits are seen from a distance as CGI creations, I got the feeling that I was watching an incredibly violent video game instead of a movie. Equally ironic is the fact that the freedom that Zion fights for is in fact just a ploy by the Machines to make it seem like humanity still has a chance. Why the Machines haven’t eliminated Zion completely during the last five iterations of the Matrix is beyond me and the filmmakers didn’t feel the need to explain it either.
Neo does his fair share of fighting as well. Attacked and blinded by Bane aboard the ship, Neo uses his powers that now exist outside the Matrix as well to dispatch this Smith incarnate. As he and Trinity near the Machine City, the Machines do their darndest to destroy them. Neo blocks the bombs and rockets as much as he can but tells Trinity to fly up as high as the ship can take them. They break through the clouds and Trinity sees the light of the Sun for the first time. Ironically, Neo is unable to see this light. They plunge back into the clouds and down into the city itself. Interestingly, Trinity, who can see the light is crashing to her doom. Neo, on the other hand, could not see the light and is crashing towards his fate as well. The light he sees is the Machine City, which he enters, heading towards his doom.
The grand finale of The Matrix Revolutions is a winner-take-all duel between Neo and Smith, who has seemingly replicated himself into all the humans attached to the Matrix. The battle of Zion pauses while Neo fights. Morpheus, in a rare moment of naïveté, assumes Neo is fighting for humanity. In fact, Neo fights for the people of Zion and for the Machines, as Smith now poses a threat to the Matrix and the Machine City itself. It’s amusing that as advanced the Machines are, they managed to be no better than humans by creating something that is capable of destroying themselves. The battle itself is bloated and drags on far too long and Smith rants insanely about destiny and why Neo feels the need to continue. There is some bad CGI on display as well, particularly when the two take their battle to the sky. Seriously? A flying fight? It was silly and served no purpose other than to show of special effects that were anything but. In the end, just as Neo defeated Smith in the real world, Smith gets to defeat Neo in the computer world. Neo allows himself to be assimilated, which somehow allows the Matrix to destroy Smith. I understand the whole balancing of the equation bit, but I never really grasped the mechanics of how or why the Machines could only destroy Smith through Neo.
Despite all the flaws, I liked the resolution The Matrix Revolutions gives us. The war ends and an era of peace and understanding is ushered in. Of course, all of this is underscored by a large question mark. How long will the peace last? At what point will the people of Zion rise up against the Machines and receive the next One? Many were frustrated by this seemingly neat and tidy yet ambiguous ending, but I was satisfied with it. Story lines were finished, though some not as well as others, and the central conflict was resolved. It’s still a little absurd to imagine that all of this took place in 3 days time, but it works. It also shows, as all the philosophical espousing implied, that the end of this conflict is not the end of the story. The lives of these characters go on, but we’re not to be privy to what comes next. People complained of losing two of the series main characters, but with all the comparisons and allusions to Neo as a Jesus figure, how could you not see it coming? The Matrix Revolutions brings the saga to a close with a whimper instead of a bang. It may not be the most pleasing way to end it all, but it’s exactly what the series needed.
After 1999’s enormously successful The Matrix captivated audiences, reinvigorated deep-thinking science fiction, and introduced the world to new levels of computer and special effects and filmmaking techniques, talk of a sequel was inevitable. Many wondered if or how the Wachowski brothers could pull off such a feat. Four years and hundreds of millions of dollars later, we got a chance to find out.
Instead of just one sequel, the Wachowski brothers promised us two sequels- to be filmed at the same time- creating a Matrix trilogy. The Matrix Reloaded was released in May of 2003 and was followed by the third and final installment that November. This, the first of the sequels turned out to be an interesting mix of too little and too much too late.
The overarching story of The Matrix Reloaded and The Matrix Revolutions is that the Machines have formed a vast army and are drilling their way deep into the earth to launch an attack on Zion, the last free human settlement on earth. After Morpheus and the crew of the Nebuchadnezzar meet up with the captains and crews of other ships in Zion’s fleet, they learn that, at the rate the machines are digging, Zion will be reached in no more than 72 hours.
The crews all return to Zion, where Morpheus discusses strategy with Zion’s security minister and a council of elders. The council allows Morpheus to take his ship outside the safety of Zion so Neo may contact the Oracle. Before they depart, the people of Zion decide to have one final party before the machines bear down upon them. It’s a very awkward scene with a lot of slow motion and a lot of sweaty bodies heaving back and forth. All the while, Neo and Trinity make love, which is equally awkward because their bodies are covered with the plugs and sockets that once connected them to the Matrix.
Neo and company head out and he meets with the Oracle. They have a deep discussion that delves into some weighty philosophical matters and it is learned that instead of a renegade person hooked up to the Matrix, the Oracle is in fact a program created by the Matrix. It sort of helps to explain why the Matrix doesn’t just kill her off, but it also complicates things and is a splash of foreshadowing. The Oracle tells Neo that he must return to The Source by finding the Keymaker and she leaves him.
At this point, The Matrix Reloaded becomes little more than a chase caper. Neo and his friends find themselves in the middle of action sequence after action sequence designed to show off the camera tricks, special effects and wire work that wowed us all in the original film. There’s Neo fighting about 100 Smith’s; Neo, Morpheus and Trinity taking on the Merovingian and his lackeys in an ornate palace, which leads into an insufferably long highway chase; and finally an assault upon a power plant and Neo’s attempt to break into The Source with the Keymaker.
These scenes include all sorts of high-flying action, guns blazing, stuff blowing up and people getting shot up, impaled or blown to bits that the fanboy and young male audiences were craving. The problem is that there isn’t a lot to these action sequences that are new. There’s no new technology or innovative camera techniques being deployed. All we end up with is even more of the same super slow-mo “bullet time” that the original introduced us to. Another chief problem is that these sequences really on a tremendous amount of computer generated effects, many of which simply look fake. In the years between production of the first Matrix film and its sequels, CGI improved a lot, but not nearly enough to the point that this film needed it to.
Interspersed between, throughout, and bookending these high octane sequences are the Wachowski brothers attempts to inject a little substance into their chase caper. Unfortunately, these attempts surface as short bursts of heavy duty philosophical banter that is likely to either go way over the viewer’s head, frustrating them by making them feel dumb, or bore them to death before the next action scene. Sometimes both. These exchanges are often times amusing and frustrating at the same time because they come either before or during exchanges of violence, making the whole fight seem absurd. Why delay kicking the crap out each other to talk Jung and Freud? It’s illogical, but the actions and exchanges go by so fast that most people probably won’t notice. If you can wrap your head around the weighty material though, it’s good stuff, but a few blasts of intellectualism can’t make up for a bloated half-film that’s candy-coated in excess.
There were several things I liked about The Matrix Reloaded. Obviously, the fight scenes and martial arts displays were well choreographed and incredibly intricate. The philosophical content was appreciable, but as I said before, it actually comes off as a bit insulting that the filmmakers thought what little substance and advancement of story there was would be enough. I was amused by Neo’s confrontation with the Architect at The Source. The Architect claims to have built the Matrix and monitors it from a massive bank of TV screens. It was actually a unique 21st Century and beyond depiction of God- the omniscient, bearded, white-haired old man who is the creator of all reality. It was also interesting how Neo defies him much in the same way that Man defies God in real life. Too bad the Architect came across as a pretentious intellectual blowhard. Finally, The Matrix Reloaded never stopped projecting a message of hope. Even in the darkest of times, people still had hope that the evils confronting them could be overcome. Sometimes it was a false sense of hope, but when your protagonists are trying to prevent their annihilation, can you really complain about false hope?
I think the biggest fault of the film, however, is the ending. Created as the first half of a two-part follow-up, The Matrix Reloaded does very little to make itself stand alone as a film. It leaves too much dangling and dependent upon the third film to create a whopping resolution. The Nebuchadnezzar is attacked by the Machines but Neo miraculously defends himself and his friends from the assault in the real world. Neo is left in a coma, Smith has managed to transfer himself into the real world by assimilating himself into the body of another crew member, and the Machines are swiftly approaching Zion. While I understand the concept of contiguous sequels, you still need make each one its own living and breathing entity. The Matrix Reloaded left me feeling like I had just watched one half of a very unbalanced equation.
This chick flick happens to be one of my girlfriend’s favorite movies, which made me wary of seeing it because I knew she’d want to know how I rated it. I’m a guy, and guys just don’t dig chick flicks. Sure, there are some really good ones out there, but this isn’t one of them.
Keanu Reeves plays a young man returning from World War II and struggling to get a good job. He’s married and desperately wants to hold a respectable and dignified job. He ends up as a traveling candy salesman. He happens upon a pregnant woman who is afraid to go home to the family vineyard because she is unwed and will be viewed as a disgrace. Reeves decides to help her out and pretend to be her husband until things smooth over with her family. Things predictably come unraveled and the family isn’t so fond of Reeves, but he wins back their trust in the end when he helps them rebuild their vineyard crop after a devastating fire.
The film includes some typical elements of the chick flick genre, so I needn’t list them here. However, the fact that most of the movie takes place under circumstances I consider unethical (helping someone by having an affair with them) and a disastrous fire that defies the laws of science (green plants do not catch fire like dried pine needles) combined to destroy my suspension of disbelief. The fact that the whole affair thing is fixed up neatly by a convenient dues ex machina (Keanu’s wife was cheating on him the whole time) destroyed any chance of the film had of landing a 3 or higher on my scale.
Although it doesn’t give in to too many conventions, A Walk in the Clouds is another run of the mill chick flick that won’t likely be remembered by too many people.
I can’t speak for everyone out there but I think that most of you will be able to feel better about your family life after seeing this film. Featuring almost every potential parental conundrum of the 1980s, Parenthood is an interesting pill to swallow. Director Ron Howard delivers a kind of flipside to the John Hughes 80s teen coming-of-age flick with a look at the parents of the 80s- those poor souls who grew up in the idyllic 60s and 70s that must now deal with their Hughesian archetypal children and the insanity of the 80s.
